18 Sep
2012
18 Sep
'12
12:59 p.m.
Ok - that change was made. The difference is that the change is applied to the task instead of the job. It's in changeset 7713:bfd10aa67c78, and it ran successfully in my environments on local, pbs, and drmaa runners. Let me know if there are any problems. Thanks again for your patience. -Scott ----- Original Message -----
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Jorrit Boekel <jorrit.boekel@scilifelab.se> wrote:
Is it possible that you are looking at different classes? TaskWrapper's finish method does not use the job variable in my recently merged code either (line ~1045), while JobWrapper's does around line 315.
cheers, jorrit
Yes exactly (as per my follow up email sent just before yours ;) )
Peter