On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock@googlemail.com> wrote:
Thanks Dave,
The good news is yes, the tests are running again on the Test Tool Shed (although not the main Tool Shed yet), and many of my tools now have successful test results from last night.
e.g. My new basic mummer tool which now has a full set of dependency packages thanks to Bjoern: https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/mummer
The bad news is there are many unexpected failures with: "Exception: History in error state."
I'm sure you'll learn more once you look over the logs,
Thank you,
Peter
Hi Dave, Any progress? All the following seem to have been tested in the last few days on the TestToolShed, but failed with "Exception: History in error state." https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blast2go https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blastxml_to_top_descr https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/clinod https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/fastq_paired_unpaired https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/get_orfs_or_cdss https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/mira_assembler https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/ncbi_blast_plus https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/nlstradamus https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/seq_filter_by_id https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/seq_primer_clip https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/seq_rename https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/seq_select_by_id That's about half of my TestToolShed repositories - most of the others report their tests passed :) I am also seeing unexpected problems with packages, e.g. https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_29 Error getting revision e78bbab7933d of repository package_blast_plus_2_2_29 owned by iuc: An entry for the repository was not found in the database. Thanks, Peter