Hello Björn,
This would be great! I'm not sure about the type attribute - <action type="cheetah_command" may be ok, but maybe a more generic type like <action type="template_command" would be better.
I'm not quite sure, so go with what you feel is best.
Thanks for looking into this!
Greg Von Kuster
On Jul 7, 2013, at 5:50 AM, Björn Grüning <bjoern.gruening@pharmazie.uni-freiburg.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking how to tackle the build failures like the atlas library
> on OS-X or the ones from xlib and ease the writing of the shell_command
> a little bit.
>
> Dave B did some fancy shell scripting in 'package_emboss_5_0_0' and I
> was also sometimes forced to use some bash tricks.
>
> What about to make that more easy and powerful, and as a plus more
> consistent with the tool-command tag, and use cheetah for that kind of
> work.
>
> Something like that could work easily:
>
> #if ${os.environ}.getVar('X11_LIB_DIR', None):
> ./configure ... --x-includes=....
> #else:
> ./configure
> #end if
>
> Also we could define some reserved variables like $__is64__ and cheetah
> evaluate that. $INSTALL_DIR and $REPOSITORY_DIR can also be a cheetah
> variable and we do not need to replace it later manually.
>
> What do you think any comments?
> If no one has any objections I can try to implement an <action
> type="cheetah_command">.
>
> Thanks,
> Björn
>