your suggestion for blastdbn and blastdbp sounds fine.
it's okay if a few of our users need to edit the metadata of the dbs in their history.
thanks for asking and doing this.

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi Edward,

I've started work on this in earnest now. I see you only defined one
new datatype, blastdb, which worked for nucleotide databases.
I want to handle protein databases too, so I think two datatypes
makes sense - which I am currently calling blastdbn and blastdbp.

That won't be compatible with your existing tools & history, but
other than that seems sensible to me. I suppose we could use
blastdb and blastdb_p which would match the *.loc files?

What do you think?

Peter