On Dec 3, 2012, at 1:26 PM, John Chilton <chil0060@umn.edu>
I should mention that I have sort of abandoned the bitbucket repository for this work in lieu of github, so that I can rebase as Galaxy changes and keep clean changesets.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Langhorst, Brad <Langhorst@neb.com> wrote:
Also - thanks for the github link - it's vastly superior to hg i think for the situation of merging pull requests. I can't figure a nice way to do a simple pull request in hg without a full scale repo duplication.
Heh - I'm not the only one struggling with hg for the sole purpose of Galaxy development then? I'd also much prefer working with git. It looks like you did a full history port as well :) Sadly I doubt Galaxy will leave hg since it is used so heavily in the Galaxy Tool Shed (here the fact that hg is written in Python must be a big plus point), and in the current recommendations for installing and updating a Galaxy deployment. I personally will probably continue to work directly with hg and bitbucket - but I'm not doing such big changes to Galaxy itself, so the need for rebased etc isn't there. Regards, Peter