11 Nov
2015
11 Nov
'15
4:19 p.m.
Hi all - Our organization requires us to use a specific AMI (with a specific flavor of linux) that isn't supported by Cloudman. Its taking us a bit of time to get this combination working. Its taken more than 3 weeks and we still don't have Galaxy / Cloudman running. I could probably do the same thing with StarCluster and be up and running within a day. I'm very comfortable with using StarCluster and am wondering if there is any benefit to using Cloudman over StarCluster for node management with Galaxy. Thoughts?