On Jul 23, 2014, at 6:42 AM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock@googlemail.com> wrote:
Interesting hypothesis - you may well be right.
Galaxy guys - who is the expert to talk to on this and/or where in the code should we be looking?
Thanks,
Peter
I think there's a bit of a mixup here - Peter, I believe you were asking if other composite types with an html primary dataset could be imported from the history to library, but Ulf, your test was the other direction (library->history). I'd be interested in knowing the outcome of the history->library test as well. I am woefully ignorant about the blastdbn datatype. Is the primary file supposed to be html type but empty? --nate
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Ulf Schaefer <Ulf.Schaefer@phe.gov.uk> wrote:
Dear Peter
Thanks for your reply.
I can import an html report (e.g. FastQC output) successfully into a new history from a data library. But the .dat file for the html is not empty like the one for the blastdb. Makes me think that I could do this with a blast db as well, if only it would not check for size 0 at the time of importing it.
Thanks Ulf
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/