9 Nov
2009
9 Nov
'09
8:46 a.m.
Andreas Kuntzagk wrote:
This looks much cleaner. (Moving the runner config to the tool_conf was also somewhere on my wish list.) Only grief I have with this is that you need to have a complete mapping of SGE (or Torque) parameters to XML elements in Galaxy (and in the documentation). Or would you also have something generic like <other_argument>-l my_limit</other_argument> ?
The idea is to use abstract parameters that can be applied to any RM that is plugged in to Galaxy in the future. However, it would make sense to provide an "RM-specific" field as you suggest, where you can add anything we don't account for. --nate