I agree that we shouldn't be hasty, but my two cents is that the galaxy-dev list should be split in two. Ironically, I think most of the traffic on this list right now is related to deployment issues - in that respect I would see it almost as Galaxy admins stay here and developer chatter move to a new list. (This could hopefully be accomplished with e-mail aliases or something). The nature of my interactions with Galaxy is such that I would still follow both lists, but I know there are people out there who have Galaxy deployed but don't really do any development per se, and I have talked to at least one such person who told me he does not follow this list because there is too much traffic. I don't think these people need to see my thoughts on a syntax for securing tool XML files or Peter's thoughts on the tool shed. Long story short, I love the sound of my own voice and I would be less self conscious about that if there were two lists :). -John On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Hans-Rudolf Hotz <hrh@fmi.ch> wrote:
On 04/24/2013 08:00 PM, Maddhi, Srinivas wrote:
Third, should we start a separate email list for GalaxyAdmins business? It would have far fewer members and have far less traffic than Galaxy-Dev. I'm in favor of it. If you have an opinion, please post here.
May want to wait until after we determine the future direction for the group unless the overhead in creating and maintaining it is low.
yes, we should wait till we made some decisions about the future of the group. I am still concerned yet another mailing list will just lead to duplications
Regards, Hans-Rudolf
___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/