i usually prefix the history names with an identifier so i can search for them (e.g. &quot;AmiMT: read QC&quot;).  but i agree, folders similar to the data libraries would be useful, so i created a  ticket.<div><br><div><a href="https://bitbucket.org/galaxy/galaxy-central/issue/621/folders-to-organize-saved-histories">https://bitbucket.org/galaxy/galaxy-central/issue/621/folders-to-organize-saved-histories</a><br>

<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Chaolin Zhang <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:zhangchaolin@gmail.com">zhangchaolin@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

Hi,<br>
<br>
Is there a way to organize related histories together into a &quot;project&quot; or folder?<br>
<br>
I realize in a lot of cases, a pipeline is designed for processing of a single sample, while a study typically consists of multiple samples that go through the same processing. They are then put together for more downstream analysis.  It seems to me that it would be logical to put the processing of each individual file into a history, and the combined analysis into another, which would be bundled together.  I, and other users here have a growing list of histories, and it is becoming more and more difficult to organize them ...<br>


<br>
Thanks!<br>
<br>
Chaolin<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
___________________________________________________________<br>
Please keep all replies on the list by using &quot;reply all&quot;<br>
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this<br>
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:<br>
<br>
  <a href="http://lists.bx.psu.edu/" target="_blank">http://lists.bx.psu.edu/</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>