Hi Greg, I'm afraid to say I might have been a bit ahead of myself in asking you to create that Proteomics category. We're almost ready to upload our tools, but at the last minute we've discovered a bunch of issues we need to sort out. I'm going away for Easter and won't be back until the 16th ... so I guess the earliest our tools would be up is after the 16th. Sorry about that. I hope you're OK with a 0 beside the Proteomics category for now. Ira On 30/03/2012, at 10:03 AM, Ira Cooke wrote:
Thanks ... that would definitely be a good idea.
Well try to implement proper tests for all the tools.
Ira
On 30/03/2012, at 10:01 AM, Greg Von Kuster wrote:
Thanks Ira,
Just so you know, the Galaxy functional test framework now supports testing installed tools if the repository tools include tests and test datasets are included in the repository in a test-data subdirectory. Here is the relevant section of the tool shed wiki describing this:
http://wiki.g2.bx.psu.edu/Tool%20Shed#Using_Galaxy.27s_functional_test_frame...
Greg
On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Ira Cooke wrote:
Dear Greg,
Thanks very much for that. I'll do a last proof-read of the tools and upload later on today.
We're working on some better documentation ... to get it all working takes some extra setup steps on the part of the user.
Ira
On 30/03/2012, at 9:49 AM, Greg Von Kuster wrote:
Hello Ira,
I've added the category to the main tool shed. Thanks for the request and your upcoming contributions!
Greg Von Kuster
On Mar 29, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Ira Cooke wrote:
Dear list,
I would like to add a suite of proteomics tools to the toolshed but there is currently no suitable category.
Would it be possible to add a category called Proteomics?
Thanks Ira