On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Dave Bouvier <dave@bx.psu.edu> wrote:
Peter,
Thanks for the information, it uncovered a problem with the testing framework that has been resolved in 10817:6b0c3592dde1. The listed repositories should start showing useful results next time the nightly tests run.
--Dave B.
Hi Dave,
I must sound like a scratched record (is there a replacement phrase now that LPs are a cultural artefact?):
Currently listed under "Latest revision: failing tool tests" but missing any test results:
http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/predictnls
(I've got a lot of fresh failures pointing at a separate issue, email to follow with a new title).
Peter
More "missing test results", yet listed under "Latest revision: failing tool tests": http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/get_orfs_or_cdss http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/seq_primer_clip http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/seq_select_by_id The common feature is they all depend on Biopython - perhaps that failed to install, and the tests were skipped? Over on the main tool shed, those three are all showing errors relating to a failed Biopython install. Peter