On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi Guys,
I retitled this since the TestToolShed does seem to be running tests regularly again. However, I still have a fair number failing with the cryptic status "Exception: History in error state."
I guess the logging changes John tried are not propagated to the user-facing output on the ToolShed, but might still offer you some clues?
It appears from the stack trace to be something with uploading the test input files into the new history?
My current list of tools with failing tests is:
https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blast2go https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blastxml_to_top_descr https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/clinod https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/fastq_paired_unpaired https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/get_orfs_or_cdss https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/mira_assembler https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/ncbi_blast_plus https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/nlstradamus https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/seq_primer_clip
I have updated some of the tools I listed below (in the older email), so their latest revision has not yet been tested.
Regards,
Peter
Hi guys,
The good news is my list of failing tools has shrunk to the following, none of which seem to have been tested yet in December, stuck with "Exception: Job in error state.":
https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blast2go https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blastxml_to_top_descr https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/clinod https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/mira_assembler https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/nlstradamus
Meanwhile, on the main tool, "Exception: Job in error state." and not yet tested in December:
https://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/blast2go
It would be nice to have a more informative error here...
Ugh - yes it clearly would - very sorry about that. https://trello.com/c/BZUaMnJB
Have these tools been automatically earmarked not to be retested? Note that some tools have been tested earlier this month:
I also have a legitimate failure for missing tests, run 2014-12-09, https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/ncbi_blast_plus
Interesting... some tests did run though? Does the framework not report passing tests - seems like it would be hard to know if it working in that case. -John
And again, a legitimate failure for some missing tests on the main Tool Shed, also run on 2014-12-09, https://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/devteam/ncbi_blast_plus
Regards,
Peter