On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Nicola Soranzo <soranzo@crs4.it> wrote:
Il giorno mar, 19/02/2013 alle 20.38 +0000, Peter Cock ha scritto:
The current minimal implementation you sent me for BLAST+ would be an excellent start. Things like data type sniffers etc would be a nice to have feature, but can be added later I think. And the sooner this gets into the Galaxy core, the sooner we can use it in the BLAST+ wrappers :)
Before proceeding on this route, one question: we are going to introduce a dependency for blast_datatypes/ncbi_blast_plus on a future galaxy release, is it ok?
I would just wait a few weeks after the new datatypes have been released in a stable Galaxy release before making the new usage within the BLAST tools public on the ToolShed. Not perfect, but simple.
I don't think it is possible to express such dependency in a repository_dependencies.xml file yet.
I don't think we can declare a dependency on a version of Galaxy itself - but that is a nice idea. Peter