Peter, Thanks for bringing this to our attention, we're working on fixing a number of issues with the test framework, and hope to have more information for you tomorrow. --Dave B. On 2013-11-11 06:11, Peter Cock wrote:
Hi Dave,
I think this is a new regression from the Test Tool Shed installation framework,
http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/ncbi_blast_plus/f2478dc77ccb
Tool test results Automated test environment Tools missing tests or test data Installation errors - no functional tests were run for any tools in this changeset revision Tool dependencies TypeNameVersion blast+ package 2.2.27 Error ("Invalid file %s specified, ignoring set_environment_for_install action.",/ToolDepsTest/blast+/2.2.27/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_27/eab09bc4d63e/env.sh)
Is that really a comma in the path? Is this a simple typo in a config file?
Note this tool is using: http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_27/eab09bc... (using platform specific actions)
--
Meanwhile, over on the main Tool Shed, which I would like to update to use arch-specific actions for the packages (since that is now in the stable Galaxy releases), and switch from BLAST+ 2.2.26 to 2.2.27, we have a different install failure:
http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/devteam/ncbi_blast_plus/70e7dcbf6573 still using 2.2.26 via shell magic, http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_26/40c69b76b46... /bin/sh: 1: blastn: not found
Peter