7 May
2013
7 May
'13
8:16 a.m.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Dave Bouvier <dave@bx.psu.edu> wrote:
Peter,
As you've already noticed, I've tracked down and fixed the main issue that was causing inaccurate test results. Thank you again for the data you provided, which was of great help narrowing down the cause of the issue.
--Dave B.
I'm glad that's sorted - I should be able to get back into fixing tests and adding a few more now that I'm getting nightly feedback again :) Thanks! Peter P.S. Is the idea of running the tests whenever a tool is updated likely to happen in the near future, or is that still a wish list item?