I&#39;m using Galaxy on a ROCKS cluster.  I installed Galaxy on the headnode.  I&#39;m using PBS instead of SGE though.  It shouldn&#39;t make a difference.<br><br><div>I haven&#39;t thought about deploying Galaxy as a Roll if that&#39;s what you are referring to.  Only because Galaxy doesn&#39;t need to run on all the nodes, it only needs a web server.  You could make a roll and deploy it on the head node only, but that just seems to be more work than necessary.  Its not be a bad idea if the roll is pre-configured and includes all the production tweaks...would have saved me 2-3 weeks of work, potentially.  But now that its installed, I&#39;m not going to go back and build a roll out of it.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Derrick LIN <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:klin938@gmail.com">klin938@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi guys,<div><br></div><div>Is there anyone has actually setup galaxy on a Rocks based cluster?</div><div><br></div><div>I know that galaxy should be hosted on a submission host so that it can submit jobs to the cluster.</div>

<div><br></div><div>Rocks provides preconfigured DRM such as SGE, so I start thinking if galaxy host should be deployed and managed by Rocks (e.g. as a Login Appliance in Rocks&#39; term).</div><div><br></div><div>Sorry if this is not a pure galaxy issue, but I guess people in here will be more appropriate to answer this.</div>

<div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Derrick </div>
<br>___________________________________________________________<br>
Please keep all replies on the list by using &quot;reply all&quot;<br>
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this<br>
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:<br>
<br>
  <a href="http://lists.bx.psu.edu/" target="_blank">http://lists.bx.psu.edu/</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>