4 Jan
2011
4 Jan
'11
7:54 p.m.
I would think the get_fields way is more robust since you wouldn't run into issues with special characters On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Peter <peter@maubp.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Daniel Blankenberg <dan@bx.psu.edu> wrote:
Hi Peter (and -dev),
Would something like ${param.fields.path} be preferred over ${param.get_fields( 'path' )}?
Thanks,
Dan
That looks nicer to type in the XML wrapper, but I am not overly bothered. Could we use either syntax for things like filters and conditional checks (in other parameters)?
Peter _______________________________________________ galaxy-dev mailing list galaxy-dev@lists.bx.psu.edu http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev