On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Joachim Jacob | VIB | <joachim.jacob@vib.be> wrote:
It is not necessarily bad. If we all test each others tools (dependencies, interface, output,...) we might get to the best of all worlds :-) (I have planned to test Björns wrapper)
One of the points of differentiation is also how 'integrated' a tool needs to be: e.g. Ross' tool for diff expression (combining a complete pipelin), and my tool just on DE with DESeq2. I like to keep things granular on the level of the tools.
That is a good reason for different wrappers, one for the tool itself, and one for a larger pipeline using the same tool. And both can declare a binary package dependency via the Tool Shed using the binary dependency package Bjoern is working on, which I assume will be released on the Test & Main Tool Shed under the shared IUC account once ready: http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/bgruening/package_deseq2_1_0_17 Regards, Peter