7:15 p.m.
Not sure if I've overlooked a setting somewhere, but is it possible to customize or
tweak the job descriptions that are displayed in the history?
Eg. "Compute sequence length on data 1" isn't very descriptive, but if
perhaps the annotation field or a description field could be added it would make
identification much easier eg. "Compute sequence length on data 1 [Burkholderia
pseudomallei K96243]" or even for datatypes that have a defined definition line,
perhaps a mouse-over hover could be added with the accession or definition pulled from the
input file? These mouse-over hovers are already used to identify the view, edit, and
delete icons so no additional libraries wold be used.
I could probably hack something up but thought it better to try and get the feature
included.
Any thoughts?
Thanx,
--Russell
7:34 p.m.
New subject: Error Loading Field Data
Hi All,
We are getting errors when creating a workflow. Some of the tools,
when selected, say only "error loading field data". As such, we cannot
use them in workflows, even though the tools work fine in Analyze Data.
This seems like it is correlated with the fact that we developed
these tools, and changed their names along the way. If this is the
cause, one solution could be for us to clear Tool Versions/Version
lineage in our galaxy instance. Is there a way to clear our cluttered
tool lineages?
Thanks for any insights,
Todd Oakley, UCSB
4:33 p.m.
New subject: Problem with Tools in Workflow Editor
Hi All,
I posted this earlier in the week, but haven't heard anything. I
changed the title of the email to hopefully attract more attention.
We are getting errors when creating a workflow. Some of the tools,
when selected, say only "error loading field data". As such, we cannot
use them in workflows, even though the tools work fine in Analyze Data.
This seems like it is correlated with the fact that we developed
these tools, and changed their names along the way. If this is the
cause, one solution could be for us to clear Tool Versions/Version
lineage in our galaxy instance. Is there a way to clear our cluttered
tool lineages?
Thanks for any insights,
Todd Oakley, UCSB
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
9:46 a.m.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Smithies, Russell
<Russell.Smithies(a)agresearch.co.nz> wrote:
Not sure if I've overlooked a setting somewhere, but is it
possible to
customize or tweak the job descriptions that are displayed in the history?
The Galaxy user can manually edit them (or do this in a workflow).
The Galaxy tool authors have some control as well, e.g. $on_string
Eg. "Compute sequence length on data 1" isn't very
descriptive, but if
perhaps the annotation field or a description field could be added it would
make identification much easier eg. "Compute sequence length on data 1
[Burkholderia pseudomallei K96243]" or even for datatypes that have a
defined definition line, perhaps a mouse-over hover could be added with the
accession or definition pulled from the input file? These mouse-over hovers
are already used to identify the view, edit, and delete icons so no
additional libraries wold be used.
I could probably hack something up but thought it better to try and get the
feature included.
Any thoughts?
Thanx,
There's been some past discussion of this from a tool developer
perspective, e.g. https://trello.com/c/JnhOEqow and
http://dev.list.galaxyproject.org/Using-input-dataset-names-in-output-dat...
See also the "Inheritance Chain" accessed via the "i" icon of
a dataset in your history. That might be tool much for a tooltip :(
Regards,
Peter
3230
days inactive
3234
days old
galaxy-dev@lists.galaxyproject.org
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Peter Cock -
Smithies, Russell -
Todd Oakley