This was due to a number of issues with the testing framework, the last of which appears to have been resolved, and I see tools being tested in the framework log. I'll check again in the morning to see if any of the tools you listed below were still not tested.
On 11/03/2014 05:51 AM, Peter Cock wrote:
I am currently hoping to review the automated test results for some repositories which I have recently updated, in one case for dependency handling, the other functional changes:
These have not yet been tested. On further investigation of a sample of my other tools, it appears none of them have been tested on the Test Tool Shed since 2014-09-15, e.g.
https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/seq_rename https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/sample_seqs https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/samtools_idxstats https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/effectivet3 https://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/clinod
Similarly, some of my tools on the Main Tool Shed appear not to have been tested since 2014-09-21, e.g.
Is there a known problem with the automated tool testing (previously every second night) on the Tool Sheds? Or have you had to further reduce the testing cycle?
Testing less frequently seems fine, say fortnightly, if this can be supplemented by testing updated tools everynight. That would give Tool Authors prompt feedback on their updates, but also catch regressions where changes in Galaxy break a previously working tool.
Peter ___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/