On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Eric Kuyt email@example.com wrote:
After installing the clc testing galaxy wrapper I noticed there are still some static paths in the wrapper. I'm in favor of expecting binaries in the system path, but maybe that's a matter of taste.
Yes - while waiting for any public opinon on $PATH versus something like $CLCBIO for my local testing I had a hard coded path. If you vote for using $PATH that is fine with me and I can update the wrapper accordingly.
Other than that is it working for you? Could you run the unit tests?
Also which version of CLCbio assembly cell do you have - and is the wrapper capturing this correctly (in case it behaves any differently to the point version we have)?
(Sorry for sending this twice, I omitted the list the first time)