8 Sep
2011
8 Sep
'11
9:14 p.m.
On 08/09/2011 14:17, Hans-Rudolf Hotz wrote:
On 09/08/2011 09:47 AM, Stephen Taylor wrote:
On 07/09/2011 20:22, Edward Kirton wrote:
seems unnecessary since illumina switched over to fastqsanger now.
http://www.illumina.com/truseq/quality_101/quality_scores.ilmn
Eventually...unfortunately we still get a lot of fastqillumina :-(
I might miss your point.....but why can't you use the fastq groomer tool?
- Duplication of data (disk space usage) - Groomer is slow and puts more demands on CPU usage where it can be done easily on the fly by tophat - Consistency (bowtie does it)
From the responses (or lack of :-)) we've been spurred on to change the wrapper. If there is interest we will commit it to the code base when done.
Cheers,
Steve