Ok, I'll figure out what I can take on here in terms of being more systematic about
determining the various error cases/fixes visa vis the master_api_key and the API, and
will get back to you. Having the master key work without a user object does sound like
the pure way to go.
From: John Chilton [jmchilton(a)gmail.com] ...
Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] master_api_key currently doesn't benefit from a real
Thanks for the detailed description - this gives me a better
understanding of what is going on. Okay - I think the right way to
handle this is probably to make the master api key work everywhere
where the user API key is insufficient.