Agreed. User driven is good. Having developer(s) available to answer
questions would be helpful...that's what I was alluding to...
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Dave Clements
<clements(a)galaxyproject.org>wrote:
Hi Ryan, Ann, and everyone else
I second what Nate says (I always do :-). I too like that it is user
driven. And, while I am not a developer, I do plan on being on the call as
often as possible.
I can also offer my support for logistical and any other support. Ann,
please let me know if you want help with getting this going and getting the
word out.
On a related note, .... With Matloob's email, we have at least 3
organizations in Australia and New Zealand that are interested. I know that
there are many more Galaxy installations in that part of the world (and you
have Enis and Ross in Australia now). Would this be a good opportunity to
set up the first (to my knowledge) regional user group? If anyone thinks
this is a good idea, please respond (and create a new thread).
Finally, Ann, thanks for starting this.
Dave C
I also that both Ross and Enis are in Australia now
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Nate Coraor <nate(a)bx.psu.edu> wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> I like that it's user-directed, and we could be there to provide input,
> although if help is needed to organize the call we could probably assist
> with that. I plan to be on the call as often as my schedule allows, and I
> believe some of the other developers on the team would also be interested.
>
> --nate
>
> On Apr 28, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Ryan Golhar wrote:
>
> > One question - Are the Galaxy developers involved in this or is this
> for user's only? It may be helpful to have developers on the call to
> provide information that users do not necessarily have.
> >
>
--
http://galaxyproject.org/GCC2012 <
http://galaxyproject.org/wiki/GCC2012>
http://galaxyproject.org/
http://getgalaxy.org/
http://usegalaxy.org/
http://galaxyproject.org/wiki/