On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:14 PM, James Taylor <james(a)jamestaylor.org> wrote:
Peter, this is great and we will look at it. The main thing I want to think
about is does this affect reproducibility in any way. We may want to keep
the old tool, and have another tool for the NCBI version (I'd love to see a
complete set of wrappers for NCBI blast+, which we could include with our
cloud images right away). Thanks!
Hi James et al.
Could you or someone from the Galaxy team take a look at my wrappers
for blastn, blastp, blastx, tblastn and tblastx and the BLAST XML to tabular
converter for possible inclusion in galaxy-central?
The BLAST+ suite is so big and has so many options that this is by no
means a "complete set of wrappers" but it covers the immediate core
functionality that I expect to need personally.