Re: [galaxy-user] fastq groomer
actually Illumina 1.8+ has one more quality value higher than fastqsanger
(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FASTQ_format )
my question now I guess is if I use fastqsanger would it break anything
when it encounters the 'J' in the qual values?
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock(a)googlemail.com>wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:21 AM, arabidopsis
<svinekod(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> If Illumina 1.8+ is already using the Sanger FASTQ encoding, the file
should
> be recognized by downstream applications, like Quality statistics
computer,
> quality filter etc. However, my file is not visible by those programs and
> when I click on it, only "uploaded fastq file" is displayed, without
> encoding details.
>
> S.
Attachments:
- attachment.htm (text/html — 1.1 KB)