galaxy-dev March 2014

galaxy-dev@lists.galaxyproject.org

101 participants
141 discussions

Sort error while running Cuffdiff
by TD 01 Jul '14

01 Jul '14

Hi All -- I'm a novice when it comes to all things programming, but I recently installed my own instance of Galaxy because I'm working with very large datasets. Everything seems to be running OK, but when I attempt to run Cuffdiff (w/ ref. annotation and bias correction from UCSC genome) on output from Tophat2, I get the following error: "*Error: sort order of reads in BAMs must be the same*." I'm perplexed, because I downloaded this output from Tophat2 that I ran on the public server, before putting it through Cuffdiff on my local instance. When I tried running the same files (prior to download) in Cuffdiff on the public server, they ran just fine. So, why do the files run properly when I run them publicly, but not locally? Am I missing some metadata? Is my install not complete? Does the ordering of bam files change when you download them? I've had a hard time finding solutions, so any tips are greatly appreciated. Cheers!

2 1

Using Mesos to Enable distributed computing under Galaxy?
by Kyle Ellrott 17 Jun '14

17 Jun '14

I think one of the aspects where Galaxy is a bit soft is the ability to do distributed tasks. The current system of split/replicate/merge tasks based on file type is a bit limited and hard for tool developers to expand upon. Distributed computing is a non-trival thing to implement and I think it would be a better use of our time to use an already existing framework. And it would also mean one less API for tool writers to have to develop for. I was wondering if anybody has looked at Mesos ( http://mesos.apache.org/). You can see an overview of the Mesos architecture at https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/docs/Mesos-Architecture.md The important thing about Mesos is that it provides an API for C/C++, Java/Scala and Python to write distributed frameworks. There are already implementations of frameworks for common parallel programming systems such as: - Hadoop (https://github.com/mesos/hadoop) - MPI ( https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/docs/Running-torque-or-mpi-on-m… ) - Spark (http://spark-project.org) And you can find example Python framework at https://github.com/apache/mesos/tree/master/src/examples/python Integration with Galaxy would have three parts: 1) Add a system config variable to Galaxy called 'MESOS_URL' that is then passed to tool wrappers and allows them to contact the local mesos infrastructure (assuming the system has been configured) or pass a null if the system isn't available. 2) Write a tool runner that works as a mesos framework to executes single cpu jobs on the distributed system. 3) For instances where mesos is not available at a system wide level (say they only have access to an SGE based cluster), but the user wants to run distributed jobs, write a wrapper that can create a mesos cluster using the existing queueing system. For example, right now I run a Mesos system under the SGE queue system. I'm curious to see what other people think. Kyle

5 8

Docker based tools
by Kyle Ellrott 07 Jun '14

07 Jun '14

I know a few people have talked about using docker to package and distribute Galaxy tools. The most recent version now runs on all major linux distributions, so it's a bit more inclusive now (but there probably won't ever be a windows or mac version). One strategy would be for tool configs to define an option Docker archive name and possibly an alternate command line to execute if the docker archive is being used. How far has that work gotten, and what are people thinking about it? Kyle

3 2

Old Tool Shed URL http://community.g2.bx.psu.edu/ dead
by Peter Cock 28 May '14

28 May '14

Hello all, Either I made a typo in some old README files, or the old URL for the Tool Shed http://community.g2.bx.psu.edu/ has stopped working. Could this redirect to the current Tool Shed address http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/ please? Thanks, Peter

3 6

user specific access/options
by Jennifer Jackson 19 May '14

19 May '14

Hi Petr, I am going to forward your email to the galaxy-dev list so that the development community can offer comments/suggestions. Best, Jen Galaxy team On 8/30/11 2:27 AM, Petr Novak wrote: > Hi everybody, > I am developing the application on Galaxy server. One of the requirement > is to create user specific list of options. Is it possible to access > somehow $__user_email__ in <options> tag or in <conditional> ?. I did > not found documentation how to used cheetah in galaxy tool xml files but > from files provided with galaxy, cheetah is used only in <command> and > <config> tag. Is that rigth? If it can be used in any part of xml > definition file it would make much easier to generate xml dynamicaly > based on the $__user_email__ > Does anybody have an idea how to manage this problem? > Petr Novak > > > ___________________________________________________________ > The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of > Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server > at usegalaxy.org. Please keep all replies on the list by > using "reply all" in your mail client. For discussion of > local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please > use the Galaxy Development list: > > http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev > > To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, > please use the interface at: > > http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ -- Jennifer Jackson http://usegalaxy.org http://galaxyproject.org/Support

3 2

Default value for data_column not working?
by Peter Cock 14 May '14

14 May '14

Hi all, I'm trying to write a new tool working with tabular data (specifically a Reciprocal Best Hits (RBH) tool using BLAST style tabular output). I want the user to be able to choose a column number (from one of the input files), but I have a default column in mind. However, Galaxy doesn't seem to obey the default column number: <inputs> <param name="a_vs_b" type="data" format="tabular" label="Hits from querying A against B" description="Tabular file, e.g. BLAST output" /> <param name="b_vs_a" type="data" format="tabular" label="Hits from querying B against A" description="Tabular file, e.g. BLAST output" /> <param name="id1" type="data_column" data_ref="a_vs_b" multiple="False" numerical="False" value="1" label="Column containing query ID" help="This is column 1 in standard BLAST tabular output" /> <param name="id2" type="data_column" data_ref="a_vs_b" multiple="False" numerical="False" value="2" label="Column containing match ID" help="This is column 2 in standard BLAST tabular output"/> <param name="score" type="data_column" data_ref="a_vs_b" multiple="False" numerical="False" value="12" label="Column containing containing score to rank on" help="The bitscore is column 12 in standard BLAST tabular output"/> </inputs> I've tried giving the default column value numerically (as shown), and also using value="c2" etc. Regardless, Galaxy just defaults to the first column. Is this a bug, or am I doing something wrong? Thanks, Peter

3 9

history item status not updating
by Robert Baertsch 12 May '14

12 May '14

I submitted a workflow that in turn submits a drm job to sun grid engine. The queue had an error (probably due to a problem with automount). Traceback (most recent call last): File "/inside/depot4/galaxy/lib/galaxy/jobs/runners/__init__.py", line 60, in run_next method(arg) File "/inside/depot4/galaxy/lib/galaxy/jobs/runners/drmaa.py", line 169, in queue_job external_job_id = self.ds.runJob(jt) File "/inside/depot4/galaxy/eggs/drmaa-0.4b3-py2.7.egg/drmaa/__init__.py", line 331, in runJob _h.c(_w.drmaa_run_job, jid, _ct.sizeof(jid), jobTemplate) File "/inside/depot4/galaxy/eggs/drmaa-0.4b3-py2.7.egg/drmaa/helpers.py", line 213, in c return f(*(args + (error_buffer, sizeof(error_buffer)))) File "/inside/depot4/galaxy/eggs/drmaa-0.4b3-py2.7.egg/drmaa/errors.py", line 90, in error_check raise _ERRORS[code-1]("code %s: %s" % (code, error_buffer.value)) DeniedByDrmException: code 17: error: no suitable queues When the sysadmin cleared the error, the job started running normally after being in an error state for 10 minutes. The cool thing is that galaxy kept running without a problem. galaxy.jobs.runners.drmaa DEBUG 2013-06-27 14:51:22,968 (10481/4767487) state change: job is running galaxy.jobs.runners.drmaa DEBUG 2013-06-27 15:00:23,628 (10481/4767487) state change: job is queued and active galaxy.jobs.runners.drmaa DEBUG 2013-06-27 15:00:27,751 (10481/4767487) state change: job is running However in the history panel, the job shows as queued but not running, even if I refresh the history panel. Is this normal or should the status change to running? I'm using this version of straight galaxy: changeset: 10162:f295092476c7 branch: stable parent: 10160:2efb1083676b user: Dannon Baker <dannonbaker(a)me.com> date: Sat Jun 15 09:08:09 2013 -0400 summary: Fix reports import issue reported by Lance, https://trello.com/card/bug-in-reports-webapp-imports/506338ce32ae458f6d15e… -Robert Baertsch UC Santa Cruz

3 3

apache setting
by Jun Fan 12 May '14

12 May '14

Hi all, Following the instruction on https://wiki.galaxyproject.org/Admin/Config/ApacheProxy to use Apache as proxy for Galaxy, I got stuck to put directives into the configuration file. The steps I took include: 1. install apache2: sudo apt-get install apache2 2. install modules mod_proxy, mod_http_proxy and mod_rewrite to support proxying a. check if mod are already enabled using: apache2ctl -M b. install: sudo a2enmod rewrite, sudo a2enmod proxy, sudo a2enmod proxy_http 3. give galaxy permission to the apache user a. find out the user who runs apache: ps -ef | grep apache and find out it is www-data b. find out groups galaxy belong: groups galaxy => galaxy c. add user www-data to group galaxy: sudo usermod -a -G galaxy www-data I believe that I have completed the job required above the "Basic configuration" section. I tried the first example: RewriteEngine on RewriteRule ^(.*) http://localhost:8080$1 [P] I tried to add them to 1) the main conf file: apache2.conf, 2) newly generated httpd.conf by myself under /etc/apache2 folder and 3) newly generated .htaccess file under /etc/apache2/conf.d folder, and none of them gave me the luck. I used "sudo service apache2 restart" after every time I tried. There is a warning " Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain name, using 127.0.1.1 for ServerName". When I type the address "127.0.0.1" or "127.0.1.1", both of them only gave me the default apache home page, not the Galaxy page. Of course the Galaxy is running on the same server. Could anyone give me some clue to continue? Best regards! Jun

2 3

Help with cluster setup
by Jurgens de Bruin 01 May '14

01 May '14

Hi, This is my first Galaxy installation setup so apologies for stupid questions. I am setting up Galaxy on a Cluster running Torque as the resource manager. I am working through the documentation but I am unclear on some things: Firstly I am unable to find : *start_job_runners *within the universe_wsgi.ini and I dont want to just add this anywhere - any help on this would be create. Further more this is my job_conf.xml : <?xml version="1.0"?>  <job_conf> <plugins> <plugin id="hpc" type="runner" load="galaxy.jobs.runners.drmaa:DRMAAJobRunner" workers="4"/> </plugins> <handlers> <!-- Additional job handlers - the id should match the name of a [server:<id>] in universe_wsgi.ini. <handler id="cn01"/> <handler id="cn02"/> </handlers> <destinations> <destination id="hpc" runner="drmaa"/> </destinations> </job_conf> Does this look meaning full, further more where to I set the additional server:<id> in the universe_wsgi.ini. As background the cluster has 13 compute nodes and a shared storage array that can be accessed by all nodes in the cluster. Thanks again -- Regards/Groete/Mit freundlichen Grüßen/recuerdos/meilleures salutations/ distinti saluti/siong/duì yú/привет Jurgens de Bruin

4 8

Re: [galaxy-dev] A proposed modules extension for toolshed wrappers
by Guest, Simon 25 Apr '14

25 Apr '14

Just been reading a bit more about the Galaxy packaging system. Here's a slight modification to what I was suggesting that might fit in a bit better. Apologies for not being more familiar with the existing system before proposing extensions. Recall that my goal is to support using a system-installed (native) package, at a defined version, which I aim to achieve by loading the appropriate environment module before running a tool. We still have tool_dependencies.xml defining a package at a particular version, but rather than download and build the source code, there's just a directive that says how to pick up the correct program version at runtime, e.g. which environment module to load. So instead of the tool_dependencies.xml fragment: <tool_dependency> <package name="bwa" version="0.6.2"> <install version="1.0"> <actions> <action type="download_by_url">http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/bio-bwa/bwa-0.6.2.tar.bz2</action> <action type="shell_command">make</action> <action type="move_file"> <source>bwa</source> <destination>$INSTALL_DIR/bin</destination> </action> <action type="set_environment"> <environment_variable name="PATH" action="prepend_to">$INSTALL_DIR/bin</environment_variable> </action> </actions> </install> </package> </tool_dependency> We have something like this (NB: element and attribute names are for illustrative purposes only): <tool_dependency> <package name="bwa" version="0.6.2"> <use_native> <actions> <action type="module_load">bwa/0.6.2</action> </actions> </use_native> </package> </tool_dependency> This causes the right thing (module load bwa/0.6.2) to be stuck into the dependencies env.sh file when this package is installed from the toolshed. We could call this toolshed tool native_package_bwa_0_6_2, to avoid confusion with the existing download-and-make one. We might want a bit of flexibility on what actions are supported (in case we want to support Software Collections, for example). What do you think? cheers, Simon PS: In case it wasn't already clear, solving this problem well is quite important to us here at AgResearch. ;-) ======================================================================= Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. =======================================================================

4 7

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

galaxy-dev March 2014