On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Luca Pireddu pireddu@crs4.it wrote:

Hello list.

A simple question: is there a git mirror of the Galaxy repositories? If not, what do git users here do to work with the Galaxy code base?

Thanks,

I don't think there is an official git mirror, but even if there was it wouldn't help for pushing changes or suggestion into Galaxy.

Speaking as a git user who only has to use hg for Galaxy, I just learnt enough hg to get the basics done, and frequently consult resources like this: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/GitConcepts#Command_equivalence_table

Peter

On Sep 5, 2012, at 4:55 AM, Luca Pireddu wrote:

On 09/05/2012 01:30 AM, Peter Cock wrote:

...

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Luca Pireddu pireddu@crs4.it wrote:

...

Hello list.

A simple question: is there a git mirror of the Galaxy repositories? If not, what do git users here do to work with the Galaxy code base?

Thanks,

I don't think there is an official git mirror, but even if there was it wouldn't help for pushing changes or suggestion into Galaxy.

Speaking as a git user who only has to use hg for Galaxy, I just learnt enough hg to get the basics done, and frequently consult resources like this: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/GitConcepts#Command_equivalence_table

Peter

Similarly, I'm also a git user who's faced with the prospect of using Mercurial only for Galaxy. Sure, the two tools work in similar ways, but it's still something I'd rather avoid for a number of reasons.

I noticed that BitBucket is now offering both mercurial and git access. Maybe there's an easy way projects can offer access to their repositories through both tools?

A solution I'm trying at the moment is git-hg (https://github.com/cosmin/git-hg). Seems to work...I've managed to clone the galaxy-dist repository as a local git repository.

I have been using git to track all local changes for more than a year now. I had looked into possible git-hg integration tools, but I hadn't found this git-hg tool back then. So I started using following workaround, but it doesn't track/convert upstream commit database in the git repo.

A pristine copy of upstream galaxy-dist code is maintained in a branch called upstream-tracker. The mercurial database is not tracked by git, but it's present in my development env's working directory.

When I want to get latest changes from upstream galaxy-dist I perform following steps: * checkout git controlled upstream-tracker branch and perform 'hg pull -u' to get latest code * commit updated code in git and record hg revision number in git-commit for reference And then to merge upstream code in our git repo: * create a new branch for merge operation starting from latest git master/develop branch * merge updated upstream-tracker branch with the merge operation branch * resolve conflicts, test the code and then merge with the master/develop branch

I am going to try out this git-hg tool as well, but I am not sure how would I get my local git repository changes in this new git-hg cloned repo now.

Thank you Luca for pointing out this git-hg tool.

-- Shantanu