Dear Galaxy team:
I was recently introduced to Galaxy framework by my colleagues in
Singapore. I am very impressed with it and want to start using it right
away. Now the questions are whether I should use the public server or
attempt a local installation. I understand this depends on how we intend
to use the system. What I would like to get advice from you is the
security of using public server. If I setup my login and start using the
system for private data, say high throughput sequencing data, who else
could possibly see my data without my knowing it?
As you know, pharmaceutical companies traditionally have a tendency
to setup everything if possible locally. With the recent data explosion,
it is becoming more and more unrealistic to maintain internal copies of
public tools and data. More importantly, I feel it could be a waste of
resource and could introduce unnecessary data provenance problems. From
the server maintenance standpoint, how much effort is needed to keep the
framework up and running? Do you encourage pharmaceutical companies to use
your public server? Have you thought about carving out a section of your
server to private users for a fee? I anticipate one or two people to use
the server initially for a period of time when we initially get the data
and afterwards occasionally use it. I hope to avoid local installation if
I possible.
Best regards,
-Jian
_____________________________________________________________
Jian Wang, PhD Informatics Eli Lilly & Co. Phone: 317
655 3496 E-mail: jian.wang(a)lilly.com
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message.